A.D. Adeyeye, O.E. Charles-Owaba


ENGLISH ABSTRACT: The GP model was developed for production planning in a toothpaste factory. Two objectives were distinguished: minimization of processing cost, and maximization of the capacity utilization of production facilities. Two priority structures were used to explore the trade-off options. When processing cost minimization was assigned the first priority, the utilizations of Processing Plant 1 and Filling Machine 2 were 20.32% and 0.18% respectively. When capacity utilization was assigned first priority, the processing cost increased by 7.55% but capacity utilization improved. The least utilized facility was Filling Machine 1 with a utilization of 43.85%.

AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die GP-model is ontwikkel vir die beplanning van produksie van n tandepastafabriek. Twee doelwitte is gestel vir die beplanning naamlik minimisering van produksiekoste, en maksimering van prosesbesetting. Wanneer minimisering van koste gebruik word as eerste prioriteit is die besettingswaardes van prosesseringaanleg 1 20.32% en van vulmasjien 2 0.18%. Wanneer prosesbesetting gebruik word as eerste prioriteit neem die proseskoste toe met 7.55% en styg die prosesbesetting. Vulmasjien 1 se gevolglike besetting was 43.85%.

Full Text:


DOI: https://doi.org/10.7166/19-2-102


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2015 The South African Journal of Industrial Engineering

ISSN 2224-7890 (on-line)

Powered by OJS and hosted by Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service since 2011.


This journal is hosted by the SU LIS on request of the journal owner/editor. The SU LIS takes no responsibility for the content published within this journal, and disclaim all liability arising out of the use of or inability to use the information contained herein. We assume no responsibility, and shall not be liable for any breaches of agreement with other publishers/hosts.

SUNJournals Help